The impeachment motion against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is gaining momentum, with over 240 Members of Parliament (MPs) pushing for his ouster.
The motion outlines serious allegations that have sparked significant political discourse in Kenya.
Charges Levelled Against Gachagua
Threatening the Head of State
Gachagua allegedly threatened President William Ruto during a meeting. He reportedly slammed the desk in frustration over a denied request for KSh 8 billion.
Reportedly, he calculated this amount based on the votes he secured for Ruto in Mt. Kenya, demanding compensation for his political support.
More Read
Corruption
The motion cites Gachagua’s involvement in corruption, claiming he amassed KSh 5.7 billion since taking office in 2022.
This raises questions about how he could acquire such wealth while earning an annual salary of KSh 12 million.
Abuse of Office
Gachagua allegedly diverted resources intended for public projects. He is accused of reallocating materials meant for the Malindi-Kilifi Highway to a private road leading to a hotel linked to him.
Promoting Tribalism
The Deputy President faces allegations of fostering tribalism through his policies. Critics argue that his “one man, one vote, one shilling” narrative exacerbates ethnic divisions.
Sponsoring Violent Protests
He reportedly incited violence among youth groups, contributing to unrest rather than promoting peace.
Leaking State Secrets
The motion claims that Gachagua leaked sensitive government information, undermining state security.
Threatening and Intimidating State Officers
He allegedly threatened and publicly condemned various state officials and MPs, straining political relations.
Opposing Cabinet Decisions
His actions reportedly undermine collective government decisions, creating discord within the executive branch.
This impeachment motion comes amid ongoing scrutiny of Gachagua’s financial dealings and past corruption charges.
Recently, the Director of Public Prosecutions withdrew a significant fraud case against him due to insufficient evidence. However, concerns about his conduct in office remain high.
As the situation develops, all eyes will be on Parliament as they deliberate on these charges and their implications for Kenya’s governance and political stability.
